హెల్త్ సైన్స్ జర్నల్

  • ISSN: 1108-7366
  • జర్నల్ హెచ్-ఇండెక్స్: 51
  • జర్నల్ సిట్ స్కోర్: 10.69
  • జర్నల్ ఇంపాక్ట్ ఫ్యాక్టర్: 9.13
ఇండెక్స్ చేయబడింది
  • జెనామిక్స్ జర్నల్‌సీక్
  • చైనా నేషనల్ నాలెడ్జ్ ఇన్‌ఫ్రాస్ట్రక్చర్ (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL పూర్తయింది
  • స్కిమాగో
  • ఎలక్ట్రానిక్ జర్నల్స్ లైబ్రరీ
  • రీసెర్చ్ జర్నల్ ఇండెక్సింగ్ డైరెక్టరీ (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC- వరల్డ్ క్యాట్
  • యూనివర్సిటీ గ్రాంట్స్ కమిషన్
  • జెనీవా ఫౌండేషన్ ఫర్ మెడికల్ ఎడ్యుకేషన్ అండ్ రీసెర్చ్
  • యూరో పబ్
  • గూగుల్ స్కాలర్
  • షెర్పా రోమియో
  • రహస్య శోధన ఇంజిన్ ల్యాబ్‌లు
ఈ పేజీని భాగస్వామ్యం చేయండి

నైరూప్య

Health Professional Mobility Effects on Professional Development, Job Satisfaction and Empowerment

Paulo Almeida Pereira

Introduction: Human resources are a fundamental part of health systems and health services. Job satisfaction is a well established determinant for human health resources retention and quality of health care and health outcomes. Objectives: To investigate health professional mobility effects on health organizations effectiveness and performance, on health professionals development, training, skills acquisition and job satisfaction in a EU country (Portugal), through a survey (electronic survey) addressed to health professionals. Methods: The “Conditions of Work Effectiveness - Questionnaire-II”, validated for the Portuguese language, was selected, to evaluate the perceptions of health workers, Portuguese speakers, working in Portugal or other countries of the European Union (EU) regarding the dimensions of access to opportunity, access to information, professional support, access to resources, creativity, collaboration and activities, and global empowerment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25 (descriptive, EFA). Results: Nearly 60% of the 1800 respondents were doctors, 72.7% of them referred working in different health institutions, whereas 51.7% of nurses referred having worked in other European countries. Positive perceptions were found regarding the dimensions of “Access to Opportunity”, “Access to Information”, “Access to Support” and “Global Empowerment”. Negative perceptions were founded for the dimensions “access to resources” and “innovation /creativity (JAS)” Conclusions: Results suggested potential for intervention and implementation of policies to address the negatively perceived dimensions of access to resources and lack of appropriate rewarding, in order to improve HRH job satisfaction and contribute to quality of health care outcomes.